Artorius Castus

My Email to the Hillary Clinton Campaign

Posted in Uncategorized by Patrick Truax on September 12, 2007

Hsu will be talking soon, how much more money does the Senator have of Hsu’s? And what did she give up for it? $850,000 is a lot of money for just campaign donations. Speculation is the Senator traded classified information from the Armed Services committee for the illegal cash.

Does the campaign have a comment?

Advertisements

16 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Patrick Truax said, on September 12, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    Troop movements, readiness reports, morale reports, all find their way to the Armed Services Committee. How can someone like Hillary not use classified information illegally? She has done it before, so has her husband. Both times that Im aware of, it involved the Communist Chinese. What more clues do we need as to HillBill’s intentions?

  2. Anonymous said, on September 12, 2007 at 6:45 pm

    Hillary is dirty, so what else is new? The MSM will cover it up, and then manufacture another “scandal” against a GOP target, and all will be forgotten. I hate to be a pessimist, but there you are.

  3. Anonymous said, on September 12, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Just another Hillary attack. Why dont you haters just let it go?

  4. Patrick Truax said, on September 12, 2007 at 6:52 pm

    Let it go, eh? She is dirty and now there is speculation as to whether she gave away classified info for the money. Treason comes easy to the Clintons. Sandy Berger, anyone? FBI files? Loral Space and Hughes Aircraft? John Huang? We havent forgotten their earlier treason, why let it go now?

  5. Anonymous said, on September 12, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    What IS it with the Clintons and the Chinese?

  6. Patrick Truax said, on September 12, 2007 at 7:03 pm

    They are the last powerful Communist State. Since the CCCP fell, the Clintons take their communism where they can get it..

  7. Patrick Truax said, on September 12, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    Please keep in mind-there is mere speculation regarding Hillary’s access to classified material. There is absolutely no proof at all that she has not been playing by the rules regarding classified info. Its just that where there is smoke, there is usually fire. If there really is speculation regarding the use of Commitee secrets and Hsu’s money, and it is untrue, that is the way it goes. The connections to Chinese Communists and the Clintons have been speculated about for years. If one hears on the radio another possible scandal regarding the Clintons, how can one help not to speculate and conclude its probably true? So in an effort to clear the air, I posed the questions to the Hillary Campaign regarding the Communist Chinese (again)and illegal campaign donations to the Clintons (again).

    I am awaiting a return email from them clearing these questions up. They should responding any minute now..yeah, right..

  8. Anonymous said, on September 12, 2007 at 8:17 pm

    There’s a reason the PRC is dumping a lot of bucks into the beast’s campaign. It’s because her philosophy mirrors the philosophy of her donors. There has been a funnel of bucks going from Beijing first to Little Rock and then to the White House.

  9. Anonymous said, on September 12, 2007 at 8:18 pm

    Dude, you better watch your back. Folks who poke sticks in the eyes of the Clintons usually wind up suffering from arkancide..

  10. Patrick Truax said, on September 12, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    I have been sitting here wondering if I should get on any airplanes bound for Dubrovnik. Or go on a nice walk around Fort Marcy Park.

  11. Mark C. said, on September 14, 2007 at 5:20 am

    Let it go! Why spend millions or more to investigate when she will only follow a previous administration that had no regard for the laws of the country. How did Ollie answer the questions, “I do not recall”.

  12. Patrick Truax said, on September 14, 2007 at 5:22 am

    Marcus, she is dirty. At the very least she has been in contact with the KGB! She must be stopped. Im alsmost finished with my next article. Keep watching for it, you love it!

  13. Mark C. said, on September 14, 2007 at 5:54 am

    So when previous people working with the Iranians which I believe was not a friend of the US, that was ok.

  14. Patrick Truax said, on September 14, 2007 at 5:58 am

    Of course it was, we ok with the Shah. He was certainly better than what Iran has now. Plus, we had a mutual enemy-Communism..

  15. Mark C. said, on September 14, 2007 at 6:02 am

    So you are ok with communist as long as they do what you want them to do.

  16. Mark C. said, on September 14, 2007 at 6:09 am

    I forgot to ask. How many elections did the Shah win? Hmm….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: