Artorius Castus

Email to Hillarys Campaign

Posted in Uncategorized by Patrick Truax on September 7, 2007

When will the Senator be responding to last nights arrest of Norman Hsu? My contact at the Treasury Department (who is about to retire) has told me that Hsu is seeking witness protection in exchange for Grand Jury testimony. Also it has come to our attention that the Senator still has NOT returned Hsu’s money to any charity. Our contact at the IRS confirms this. Given that the Senator has yet to comment on this mushrooming scandal, is it fair to determine she has hired legal counsel? And what of the Paw’s, who laundered the illegal donation, will the Senators campaign be providing legal counsel? I will follow up with a phone call to Senator’s campaign staff.

Staff at Artorius Blog


9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Patrick Truax said, on September 7, 2007 at 2:35 pm

    We are still awaiting response from last weeks emailed questions regarding the Communist Chinese illegal donations(again!) to a Clinton Campaign. Her campaign’s silence is deafening. At this juncture was must conclude that Hsu’s life is danger-his Grand Jury testimony could severely shake the country’s faith in the Democratic Process. For Hillary to accept money from Communist China is very telling-her husband did it, and as result several defence contractors sold technology that is now being used against us by the Communist Chinese. Consider, too, that the Communist Chinese are engaged in knowingly shipping shoddy products for export. I cant speak for the geniuses in Hillary’s War Room, but honest and reasonable Americans should be appalled by Hillary’s willingness to subvert America for personal gain. I will post again after my phone call to the campaign office.

  2. Anonymous said, on September 7, 2007 at 2:37 pm

    Dont hold your breath. The Clintons are already starting their campaign of denial. I hope your IP isnt being tracked..

  3. Anonymous said, on September 7, 2007 at 2:40 pm

    If I were Hsu, Id be requesting Protective Custody! Lowlifes like the Clintons know one or two that are banged up, as our British cousins like to say. A prison guard (they are union members) could slip a shank to a lifer and Hillary’s “problem” dies with Hsu.

  4. Anonymous said, on September 7, 2007 at 2:58 pm

    Patrick, I hate to burst your bubble, as I know how hard you work on this, but every scandal the Clintons get involved in are covered up by a willing media and judiciary. Both should be prison by now, but instead she is a Senator and he is a rich ex president. I hate to say it, but they are untouchable..

  5. Patrick Truax said, on September 7, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Oh ye of little faith!

  6. Anonymous said, on September 7, 2007 at 3:17 pm


    On September 7, 2007, (this is today) a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Paul v Clinton, a historic civil case involving a former president, Bill Clinton, and sitting senator, Hillary Clinton, accused of committing business fraud and collapsing a public company, Stan Lee Media (SLM). Yes that Stan Lee, the creator of “Spiderman”.

    Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client, Hillary Clinton, is not a felon and should remain protected by California’s anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants.

    The California Supreme Court has already said Bill Clinton stays in the case. This appellate hearing will determine whether Hillary is brought in to join him as a defendant.
    If she is not brought into the case as a defendant, the trial judge made it clear to her counsel, David Kendall, that Hillary will be under oath testifying.

    The charges are that Peter Paul was induced to spend money on Hillary’s 2000 Senate campaign with the promise that Bill Clinton would work for SLM for one year as a rainmaker (a person who creates a significant amount of new business to a company) when he left the White House, an agreement Bill Clinton reneged on. He was to get $15-$17 million in stock and cash.

    Evidence in the trial will reveal the greatest campaign finance fraud ever, four false FEC (Federal Election Commission) reports, and Hillary’s role in the solicitation of an illegal $1.6 million hard money, in-kind donation. Unlike any other evidence before, Peter Paul has several hours of home video of Hillary Clinton and others in which she is directly implicated. She will not be able to use the “I don’t recall” dodge without perjuring herself.

    The campaign contributions noted above, and the facts in this demand letter to Sen. Hillary Clinton, are an integral part of this case.

    October 18, 2006
    Senator Hillary Clinton
    U.S. Senate
    Washington, DC
    Via Hand Delivery
    Re: Second Request to Correct False FEC Report and Refund Illegal and Excessive Contributions Made in Cooperation and Consultation And At The Request Of A Candidate
    Dear Hillary:
    It has been five years since my original demand letter (attached) was delivered to your Senate chambers on July 16, 2001. In that letter I reminded you of the facts surrounding my personal expenditures of more than $1.2 million to benefit your 2000 Senate campaign, at the direction of yourself and your agents Bill Clinton, Ed Rendell, David Rosen, Kelly Craighead and James Levin.
    I respectfully requested that you obey the laws you swore to uphold when you took the oath of the office I significantly aided you in obtaining. I asked that you file corrected reports with the FEC and IRS regarding my contributions and that you obey the laws requiring that you refund my illegally excessive cash in kind contributions of more than $1.2 million as now corroborated by the FBI, Justice Department Office of Public Integrity and the FEC.
    You refused to take any action to correct the three false FEC reports filed by your Joint Fundraising Committee, New York Senate 2000, and you stood by while a fourth false report was filed with the FEC by your campaign treasurer, Andrew Grossman, on July 30, 2001.
    You have refused to comment publicly on your role in directing and coercing my expenditures on behalf of your campaign between June and October, 2000, relying on spokes-lawyers who have consistently misled the media by stating that New York Senate 2000 filed correct reports. You have maintained that position until the December, 2005 admission by your campaign, in a forced settlement with the FEC based on overwhelming evidence of an intentional violation of Federal Election Law, that it did in fact file three false reports that hid more than $720,000 I expended on your campaign’s behalf.
    No comment has been made by you or any of your spokes-people regarding the statements made on your behalf to the voters and your opponent, through the Washington Post in articles on August 15 and 17, 2000, that you vowed not to accept any money from me, that you refunded any money I contributed and that I contributed no money whatsoever to Event 39, the Hollywood Gala Farewell Salute to President Clinton on August 12, 2000 that I produced and paid all expenses for.
    Your campaign filed a fifth FEC report on January 30, 2006, which purportedly corrected all previous false reports, and your campaign now attributes $225,000 as being contributed personally by my former partner Stan Lee, and $839,000 as being contributed by my two personal holding companies, Excelsior and Paraversal which somehow were lumped together as co-contributors of $839,000.
    As you know, this FEC report, and the uncorrected IRS report made to mirror the original FEC 2000 reports, are false. Since you requested and suggested I make the personal contribution that I made that exceeded $1.2 million, and your agents Bill Clinton, Ed Rendell, David Rosen, Kelly Craighead, James Levin cooperated, consulted and even coerced me in connection with my contribution, you have been well aware that all of these reports are false, and all statements made on your behalf to the investigatory agencies that looked into this matter have been false.
    In addition, Stan Lee has testified publicly, under oath and to all investigatory agencies that he gave no money to your campaign or to pay for Event 39. Yet he is now attributed by your campaign to have given $225,000. I have attached to this letter my demand letter to him (below) to notify you immediately to correct this January 30, 2006 report and attribute the $225,000 to me as the correct donor. I have also notified you that I made a $100,000 contribution through him which I reimbursed him for and which he has also confirmed in sworn testimony.
    I have conducted all of my personal and business transactions through personal holding companies I wholly owned and controlled, including Paraversal and Excelsior, and all of the assets of those companies are my personal property and funds, and no one else’s. You are again on notice that all monies attributed as contributions to your campaign from my alter egos are in fact my funds over which I exercised complete dominion and control. Your efforts to confuse that issue by maintaining I never wrote one personal check to your campaign belie the fact that I never wrote personal checks for any business related expenditures I have made since 1979 when Fidel Castro’s government obtained a judgment against me.
    Considering that Title 2 USC 441 f and 2 USC 441 a(a)(7)(B)(i) have been violated by your actions, and that all of my contributions on your behalf are attributable solely and exclusively to your candidacy, making them illegally excessive, I hereby demand you correct the latest FEC report that misreports my personal contribution of $1,060,000 and immediately cause that illegal contribution to be refunded at long last.
    Please arrange with my counsel at U.S.Justice Foundation, Gary Kreep, to accept that refund as a contribution to that 501 c(3) educational foundation that fights public corruption and supports Constitutional rights.
    Very Truly,
    Peter F. Paul
    c/o US Justice Foundation
    Ramona, California

  7. Patrick Truax said, on September 7, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    I need to be posting this demand letter everyday..

  8. Anonymous said, on September 8, 2007 at 4:42 pm

    Anyone with eyes to see has to come to the inescapable conclusion that Hillary! and all who surround her and do her bidding are outright communists. Her “It Takes a Village” is nothing more than a blueprint for mandatory “day care” (read marxist education camp); Hillary!care would bankrupt the U.S. and reduce us to the level of Cuba. Remember the collusion between Hillary! and one of those California senators’ conversation re the shutting down of patriot radion, as overheard and reported by Sen. Inhofe? It would only be a matter of time before The Hoover Building is turned into 2 Dzhershinsky Square. Think she’d let a little thing like the Second Amendment stop her quest to disarm those whom she would enslave? The Beast Must Be Stopped!

  9. Patrick Truax said, on September 8, 2007 at 4:47 pm

    She must be stopped, indeed. It wont take a lot of legwork, either. Just exposure..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: